Skip to content
PMMilestone :: Project Management and Engineering Blog
Menu
  • PMMilestone Home
  • Blog
  • Project Management
  • Business
  • Engineering
  • 12000+ PM and Business Templates
  • Contact
Menu
management

The Australian’s suspect report on government consultancy spending

Posted on May 3, 2025




A suspect report in The Australian has claimed the present Labor authorities has just lately spent nearly as a lot on ‘costly consultants’ as throughout the peak of its Coalition predecessors.

The Liberal occasion’s assaults and stuttering coverage on the APS seem to have largely backfired throughout this election marketing campaign. Now, contemporary off its newest endorsement for the Coalition, The Australian is making an attempt a special method in a last-minute tack in the direction of ‘whataboutism’.

In a report sub-headlined, “Anthony Albanese spends as a lot as Scott Morrison on the providers of KPMG, PwC, EY and Deloitte”, The Australian has made the declare that the present Labor authorities has as soon as, beforehand, paid near the identical annual quantity for “costly consultants” as throughout the peak of spending underneath Liberal.

Whereas it’s troublesome to pin down the report’s shifting reference factors, the publication places ahead a $660 million price ticket on consulting expenditure over the 2023-24 monetary 12 months as per AusTender information “reviewed solely for The Australian”, in comparison with a $680 million determine calculated to have been spent underneath the earlier authorities over the 2019-20 interval.

In line with a broadcast desk offered by the unnamed analysts, these selective, single-year numbers relate to AusTender information for Commonwealth contracts awarded over an arbitrary price of $1 million underneath the procurement platform’s ‘consultancy’ classification.

Sliding metrics

Utilizing such a metric, the $665 million supposedly spent amongst all suppliers on ‘consulting’ in 2023-24 seems fairly shut on the floor when measured in opposition to the $682 million sum of over 2019-20, ignoring for the second that Labor’s ongoing long-term effort to cut back spending has seen that outlay drop to $577 million this 12 months, in response to the paper’s personal information.

But, the report then states that the info signifies EY, KPMG and Deloitte acquired consulting contracts including as much as $145 million in 2023-24 (it’s unclear if the $1 million threshold has nonetheless been utilized to reach at that whole), earlier than bumping the quantity as much as in extra of $470 million by way of a wider evaluation of “revenue reported in different classes”.

Right here, the inflated $470 million tally mentioned to have been collected by three of the Massive 4 members throughout all Commonwealth contracts throughout 2023-24 doesn’t remotely examine if making use of the identical broader standards. Earlier evaluation by the AFR and plenty of different organisations places the true comparative determine at $1.4 billion throughout the Coalition’s last 12 months in workplace.

The Big Four

Massive 4 bait

Headline-grabbing PwC additionally appears to instantly slip out of the equation, with consideration as an alternative turning to, within the writer’s phrases, a little-known consultancy by the identify of Nous Group, which is usually run “by former public servants”, and a contradictory comply with up assertion that, “in actual fact, the info reveals consulting budgets have merely been reallocated away from the Massive 4.”

As an amusing apart, the article quotes an nameless Massive 4 companion who in reference to Nous complains that it appears a bit of unfair that their agency now has to compete with individuals who used to work on the similar authorities division, however we’ll skip a recap on the well-documented revolving door between the Massive 4 and the federal government and public sector and get again to the purpose.

The sub-headline of The Australian’s ‘unique’, which is objectively incorrect in its assertion – even by the numbers the newspaper has been equipped with and itself passes on in flip – is at best possible a bit muddled, however at worst strikes as more likely to be deliberately deceptive contemplating the contradictory report and its personal particulars which comply with.

General outsourcing

The Massive 4 right here is the bait, with the article’s actual thrust arguing that Labor has misled the general public by obscuring the quantity it spends on consultants, which is in flip a distraction from the larger image on the coronary heart of the talk on APS capabilities and general outsourcing, with Labor itself partly responsible for generally conflating advisory with the latter.

Nonetheless, within the lead-up to the final election, the occasion vowed to slash $3 billion from its public sector outsourcing invoice over 4 years, which included consultants, contractors and exterior labour, changing costly non permanent hires into everlasting positions whereas increase APS capabilities. On that foundation, the federal government has surpassed and since prolonged its said objectives.

The Australian did nonetheless discover an unlikely ally in its marketing campaign in Greens senator Barbara Pocock, who co-led the a number of senate enquiries into the business following the PwC tax breach scandal and has been just lately questioning the federal government on the particular query of what quantity of its financial savings have been achieved by way of a discount in precise consulting.

“It’s just about not possible to get a transparent image of the federal government’s spending on consultants,” Pocock advised the newspaper in renewing her requires reforms to the best way contracts are reported on AusTender, including to an more and more dizzying article criticising the federal government’s spending on consultants based mostly on information derived from AusTender.

How much does the Australian government spend on external consultants?

How a lot does the Australian authorities spend on exterior consultants?

Public sector battle

With a aspect of implied Labor hypocrisy in its ongoing advisory spending, which is like any person totalling my automobile after which stating my Uber rides whereas it’s nonetheless being repaired, the logical manoeuvring of The Australian’s article bends previous breaking when conserving in thoughts its precise goal; to sway public opinion in the direction of the occasion which has pledged to chop 45,000 APS jobs.

Naturally, such a coverage shift would as soon as once more vastly improve the federal government’s self-perpetuating reliance on advisory and out of doors help, along with its spiralling related prices. In the meantime, as its APS rebuild positive aspects momentum, the incumbent authorities is heading within the different path, declaring that if reelected it might discover a additional $6.4 billion in outsourced financial savings over the approaching 4 years.



Source link

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • PMMilestone Home
  • Blog
  • Project Management
  • Business
  • Engineering
  • 12000+ PM and Business Templates
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • How to avoid falling behind on massive projects
  • Microsoft Project pour Mac : comment utiliser des fichiers MS Project sur Mac
  • Airlines face investors after strong— but cheaper — July 4 holiday
  • Scenario-Based eLearning For Compliance Training That Sticks
  • Dining Room Decor Ideas That Actually Work in 2025: Expert G

This page has been viewed 0 times.

©2025 PMMilestone :: Project Management and Engineering Blog | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme