Skip to content
PMMilestone :: Project Management and Engineering Blog
Menu
  • PMMilestone Home
  • Blog
  • Project Management
  • Business
  • Engineering
  • 12000+ PM and Business Templates
  • Contact
Menu
management

Q&A With Dr. RK Prasad: Exploring Classroom Training’s Comeback

Posted on June 28, 2025





Exploring AI’s Function In eLearning And ILT’s Strategic Comeback

Dr. RK Prasad has a long time of expertise in company coaching, college instructing, and eLearning. As we speak, he speaks with us about how AI is bringing the classroom again into vogue, the unreplaceable function of people, getting ready for an L&D future with AI, and extra.

There’s nonetheless some reluctance to undertake AI within the eLearning trade. What would you say to L&D professionals who imagine that AI is a human alternative?

Final month, I used to be talking with a bunch of Studying and Growth leaders about the way forward for Tutorial Design. One senior supervisor summed it up in a single sentence: “I am excited by AI’s potential and in addition questioning if I am going to have a job in 5 years.” That pressure? It is actual, and it is rising.

Synthetic Intelligence is already reshaping how we create, ship, and consider studying. At first look, that seems like a dream come true: sooner content material growth, personalised studying paths, real-time analytics. However scratch the floor, and there is a greater shift underway, one which challenges our assumptions about what makes an L&D crew indispensable.

The query we must be asking is not whether or not AI will change us. It is this: What’s going to nonetheless require a distinctly human contact? And the way can we defend and amplify it?

Based mostly in your real-world experiences, how is AI impacting the Tutorial Design subject proper now?

The AI tsunami has already hit Tutorial Design. Let’s not sugar-coat this. Tutorial Design, the craft of constructing efficient, partaking studying experiences, is dealing with automation head-on.

Instruments reminiscent of ChatGPT, Midjourney, Vyond, Synthesia, and Canva’s AI suite now let a single individual produce scripts, voiceovers, visuals, and storyboards in a fraction of the time it used to take a crew. Adaptive studying engines reminiscent of MaxLearn and Docebo are personalizing experiences at scale. Translation instruments like Smartcat are lowering turnaround time and value by over 50%. It is thrilling. But it surely’s additionally unsettling.

When a junior designer can generate a primary onboarding module in two hours utilizing AI, what occurs to the senior designer who used to take two weeks? What occurs when inside enterprise models understand they will bypass L&D fully and nonetheless get “adequate” coaching?

Even worse, what occurs when the mental property in your coaching supplies—your secret sauce—is absorbed into AI coaching information or leaked by unsecured platforms?

What are the restrictions of AI in terms of studying content material growth and supply?

Regardless of the facility of those instruments, AI cannot replicate all the things. It could possibly’t coach somebody by a troublesome dialog. It could possibly’t discover {that a} high-potential chief is withdrawing throughout a classroom exercise. It does not really feel the hesitation in somebody’s voice throughout a role-play.

It does not perceive the messy, lovely nuance of human conduct in actual time.

That is why I imagine Teacher-Led Coaching (ILT) and stay facilitation are going to make a strategic comeback. Not because the default mode, however because the premium tier; the a part of the educational technique reserved for high-stakes transformation, management growth, and cultural alignment.

As a result of no AI-generated module, irrespective of how elegant, can replicate:

  • Belief-building between people
  • Cultural sensitivity in a worldwide crew context
  • The flexibility to learn a room, pivot mid-session, and create a secure house
  • Judgment honed by a long time of expertise

In brief, AI is sensible at content material. However transformation occurs in context, and context remains to be human terrain.

How can organizations future-proof themselves and their groups whereas nonetheless embracing the potential of AI?

We hedge. Not by rejecting AI, however by doubling down on what makes us uniquely human. This is what I believe we’d like  to do:

1. Protect and prioritize stay experiences. ILT and classroom-based studying supply a relational depth that digital cannot contact. Use AI to automate the “what,” and reserve people for the “why” and “how.”

2. Elevate judgment and ethics. Who will resolve which conduct counts as “success” in your management module? Who ensures bias does not creep into your DEI coaching information? These will not be duties for algorithms. They demand human oversight and moral reasoning.

3. Construct emotional intelligence as a core ability. AI does not know the best way to mediate battle, coach nervousness, or encourage belief. You do. And that makes you invaluable.

4. Create real studying communities. Whereas everybody else automates their LMS to ship nudges, you may create inside networks, mentoring circles, and suggestions boards the place staff study from each other, not simply from content material.

5. Defend your mental property. Keep away from importing proprietary content material into public AI instruments. Advocate for safe, enterprise-grade AI programs. Educate your crew on the dangers of “immediate leakage” and shadow AI use.

Listed below are 5 questions to seek out your human edge. Ask your self and your crew:

  1. What elements of our L&D work depend on emotional intelligence or stay interplay?
  2. Which stakeholders belief us due to our judgment, not simply our output?
  3. What coaching moments have we led that might by no means have labored in an AI-only format?
  4. The place will we create psychological security, not simply compliance?
  5. What a part of our expertise is so context-rich that it will be not possible to simulate or replicate?

These are the fault traces AI cannot cross. They usually’re the place our future lies.

What do you assume the longer term holds for AI in studying, significantly relating to the human-AI collaboration?

It will be a hybrid future, not a binary one. AI is not the enemy. Used correctly, it is an unbelievable ally, however we should be discerning. Use it to scale, simplify, and velocity up. However draw a line across the work that defines your humanity.

At CommLab India, we’re integrating AI in our translation and fast growth pipelines. However we’re additionally working high-touch management labs, feedback-intensive efficiency teaching, and experiential workshops that AI could not lead.

The closing wager is that individuals will matter extra. AI is coming for the repeatable, the scalable, the impersonal. Let it. What it will possibly’t contact—not but, possibly by no means—is what makes you human:

  • Your skill to hear deeply
  • Your intuition to guard learners
  • Your expertise for turning friction into progress
  • Your reward for connecting individuals

The winners of the following decade in L&D will not be those who used AI probably the most. They will be those who knew what to not hand over. So, lean into your humanness. Design with empathy. Facilitate with presence. And educate others to do the identical. As a result of in the long run, the neatest instruments on the earth will not matter if nobody trusts the palms that use them.

What function do human qualities nonetheless play in Tutorial Design?

A considerate counterpoint: do not simply be human, be distinctive. Let me supply a mild problem to all the things I simply mentioned.

Sure, human qualities reminiscent of empathy, judgment, and belief matter. However we must be cautious to not romanticize them as completely secure from disruption. AI is advancing quick, sooner than most of us are ready for. It is studying to imitate emotional nuance, adapt conversations in actual time, and even simulate facilitation dynamics. It is already analyzing behaviors, voice inflections, and choice patterns with eerie precision.

So, whereas we might really feel safe in our “human edge” in the present day, that edge is narrowing shortly. Which is why it is not sufficient to easily be human. We have to be exceptionally human to deliver depth, creativity, and originality that AI cannot replicate or predict.

Which means:

  • Constructing relationships that transcend well mannered professionalism
  • Designing studying moments that stir reflection, not simply recall
  • Main with curiosity, not simply competence
  • Having the braveness to ask, “What do I supply that is really irreplaceable?”

As a result of the reality is, AI will quickly do adequate in lots of areas of L&D. If we accept being adequate too, we lose our lead.

So sure, I nonetheless imagine human connection will matter greater than ever. However provided that we increase the bar on what it means to point out up as leaders, designers, and facilitators.

Wrapping Up

Many due to Dr. RK Prasad for talking with us and sharing his helpful insights. RK was featured in our eLearning Trailblazers Listing, and you’ll learn his articles by visiting his writer profile on our website, the place he covers fast eLearning growth, AI-enabled coaching, and way more.



Source link

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • PMMilestone Home
  • Blog
  • Project Management
  • Business
  • Engineering
  • 12000+ PM and Business Templates
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • The Future of Agile: PMI’s Role in Evolution and Best Practices
  • How to avoid falling behind on massive projects
  • Adolfson & Peterson starts 2 Texas high school projects
  • The Digital Shift: Leveraging Social Media for Sales Success
  • How Geotechnical Engineering is Shaping the Future of Environmental Sustainability

This page has been viewed 0 times.

©2025 PMMilestone :: Project Management and Engineering Blog | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme